The UK Government has now moved in wholesale on the issue of freedom of speech by introducing huge fines for 'social media' companies who fail to remove content on their sites deemed to be considered....'Hate Speech'. Hate Speech is defined by the (online) Encyclopaedia Britannica as; 'Hate speech, speech or expression that denigrates a person or persons on the basis of (alleged) membership in a social group identified by attributes such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, religion, age, physical or mental disability, & others. Typical hate speech involves epithets & slurs, statements that promote malicious stereotypes, & speech intended to incite hatred or violence against a group. Hate speech can also include nonverbal depictions & symbols. For example, the Nazi swastika, the Confederate Battle Flag (of the Confederate States of America), & pornography have all been considered hate speech by a variety of people & groups.'
For a start, the Swastika is a sacred symbol in Hinduism as well as many other religious groups including Freemasonry, & the Germans never referred to themselves as 'Nazi's, this epithet was slapped upon them after the war by the Allies. Incidentally, the term 'Nazi' has it's root in Hebrew; http://bibleapps.com/n/nazirite.htm
A Nasi in Judaism is High Priest & so on. What were we talking about? Oh yeah, Holocaust Denial is a form of Hate Speech; 'During its investigation, the committee found instances of terror recruitment videos for banned jihadi & neo-Nazi groups remaining accessible online even after MPs had complained about them.' (The Gaurdian).
The dissemination of Holocaust Denial material is also a form of 'Fake News', which we've all been hearing a lot about lately; 'Fake news" has become a subject of real news. But there's nothing new about "fake news." Holocaust deniers have generated fake news for decades. The deniers have funded "research" "institutes," "journals," books, magazines, videos, websites, newsflashes – all designed to provide a patina of academic respectability to demonstrable falsehoods.' Writes Alan M. Dershowitz of the Gatestone Institute.
The UK Government has recently launched an inquiry into Fake News; http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/culture-media-and-sport-committee/news-parliament-2015/fake-news-launch-16-17/
Blimy! It's findings should reveal that they themselves have been the source of most of it throughout the last 500yrs.
I've tried to prove in my 'Fabricated History Of The 3Rd Reich' blog that the secret services/societies were operating a form of the Hegelian Dialectic in the realm of Revisionism (revised history), as they're behind most of the main Holocaust Denial "research" "institutes," "journals," such as CODOH & the IHR, the objective being to bring down Judaism & shackle the mob in a one world socialist, totalitarian state as Bill would say..........the very situation we now see unfolding before us.
Fake News & Hate Crime are just devices devised to shut us up, They know people will find gaping holes in the official stories so they head those lines of inquiries but add on 'It's the Jews behind it all'. I only mention Holocaust Denial because in many countries in Europe, to publish or state in public any opinion that differs from official versions of events during WW2, even if it's a fact & even if you're Jewish, can & probably will land you in jail, it will certainly lead to persecution & that's what's coming to us all. Holocaust Laws, 'denial' stigmatisation etc are designed so that Jews are perceived to be receiving preferential treatment, but this can only be effective after receiving sufficient propaganda that it's the Jews who create all the Laws, run the banks, start all the wars etc if you catch my drift.
One is reminded of George Orwell's vision of the future in the book '1984', wherein it's unlawful to think or say anything contrary to the rules of the State, 'crimethink - To even consider any thought not in line with the principles of Ingsoc. Doubting any of the principles of Ingsoc. All crimes begin with a thought. So, if you control thought, you can control crime.'
Who can we criticise then? The 'Social Group' mentioned by the Encyclopaedia Britannica above in the criteria for Hate Speech is defined by them as; 'Social group, any set of human beings who either are, recently have been, or anticipate being in some kind of interrelation. The term group, or social group, has been used to designate many kinds of aggregations of humans. Aggregations of two members & aggregations that include the total population of a large nation-state have been called groups.'
So who does that leave? Usages of terms such as 'Nigger', 'Paki', 'Sweaty Sock' (slang for 'Jock'), 'Honky' etc are becoming a thing of the past, rightly so perhaps? I'm not so sure, because in the doing so it curtails our instinctual capacity for critical thinking. Offensive as these words we sometimes use seem, & I wouldn't encourage anyone to use these or any other colloquial terms disparagingly towards one another, they are after all only terms we apply to designate separation, we are different, have different cultures & so on, or at least we used to be & it's this separateness which is under attack.
We're being homogenised, people are afraid to say something contrary to the party line for fear of being called a conspiracy theorist, which has now become one of those sociological/alchemical 'MEMES' Bill was warning about in his last show on the Mysteries, he mentions democracy as being another, & I'd add to that Holocaust Denier. They can only come into effect however because of the socialist foot-soldiers, for it's these people who enforce it at a local level, we all know who they are, so the next time they try to humiliate you in public by calling you a conspiracy theorist challenge them, ask them to be specific;
'A conspiracy theory is an explanation of an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy without warrant, generally one involving an illegal or harmful act carried out by government or other powerful actors.' - Wikipedia
then watch as they become confused, stamp their feet, head for the door, then come back. We're supposed to question history, the very word itself is Greek for 'enquiry', & as citizens we're supposed to question our governments, in fact it's our duty, to not do so would be detrimental to everyone, politicians included, or at least that's how it's supposed to work......in theory.
If people are to be prosecuted for verbal attacks on other peoples religion, can we start with this war-mongering pig;
'Here (Palestine) it is that the poison is incubated. Here it is that the extremist is able to confuse in the mind of a frighteningly large number of people the case for a Palestinian state & the destruction of Israel, & to translate this moreover into a battle between East & West, Muslim, Jew & Christian. May this never compromise the security of the state of Israel. The state of Israel should be recognized by the entire Arab world, & the vile propaganda used to indoctrinate children, not just against Israel but against Jews, must cease. You cannot teach people hate & then ask them to practice peace....The threat of this radical Islam is not abating. It is growing. It is spreading across the world. It is destabilising communities & even nations. It is undermining the possibility of peaceful co-existence in an era of globalisation....That is what this struggle against terrorist groups or states is about. We're not fighting for domination. We're not fighting for an American world, though we want a world in which America is at ease. We're not fighting for Christianity, but against religious fanaticism of all kinds.'
- Tony Blair (2003 US Congress speech).
If all else fails, then ram this down their throat;
'The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free & open society; & we are as a people inherently & historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths & to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive & unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. & there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship & concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. & no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press & the public the facts they deserve to know.'
- John F Kennedy
Now here's Manly's point of view;